Search Beville.com

This website does not use cookies. Read Privacy Policy here.
.
Beville Logo - human factors engineering consultants

Cost of Red Pumps

NEWSLETTER ARTICLE

A key criterion for an effective color code is that it is unique – the stimulus (color) means one and only one thing. Another criterion is that color codes should match population stereotypes or expectations where possible; for example, use yellow for caution. The two criteria come into conflict with the use of the color red, which has popular stereotypes for both stop and warning/danger. Many display standards achieve the uniqueness criterion simply by choosing that red will mean either stop or warning and selecting a different color to indicate the other. However, many companies, and even the American Petroleum Institute, use red for both warning (alarms) and stopped/closed. What does this violation of the uniqueness criterion cost in terms of human performance?

Display used in experiment

Figure 1. Display Used in Experiment

Students at Wright State University addressed this question in their senior design project in human factors engineering. They tested multiple targets (alarms) with different time constraints using one basic display where red meant only stopped pumps and another version where red indicated both stopped pumps and alarms (Figure 1). In this project, students measured three performance variables: number of missed alarms, number of false alarms, and time to fixate on the alarms. The latter was the determined by using eye-tracking software to determine exactly where the subject was looking. In addition, the interaction between accuracy and the time constraints was examined to determine if a speed/accuracy effect was present. The results of all of these were statistically significant at the p=0.05 level (less than a five percent probability that the results were due to random fluctuations).

Display designers often think they are doing the right thing in having red mean both stopped and warning. It satisfies the population stereotype criterion. However, it comes at a cost. The costs are:

1. being 10% less accurate,
2. having three times as many false positives,
3. taking 20% longer to find the alarm, and
4. making more errors as the time demands increase.

Copyright 2020 Beville Operator Performance Specialists, Inc.

For further information, visit the links below.

| Alarm & Display System Analysis Overview | Alarm Management | Display Design | Alarm & Display Design Seminar | Beville Shape Calculator -Excel download | Alarm Distribution Estimator - Excel download |


RELATED EXTERNAL MEDIA

Link Published By
Operator Interfaces Expand Human Factors Automation World
How to Build a Better Operator - ABB Automation & Power World Control Design
Operators Get More Help Chemical Processing
Simple, Strong and Easy-to-Use Control Global
DCS Console Operator Issues in Related Industries TAPPI
Operator Interfaces: Moving from Comfortable to Most Effective Automation World
BEVILLE NEWS

The 2024 Spring Meeting of the Center for Operator Performance will take place on April 16-18, 2024, in Pine Bend, MN/Hybrid. For more information on this and future meetings, please contact Lisa Via. Guests are always welcome!

Our most recent newsletter is now available. Click here!


David Strobhar's book, "Human Factors in Process Plant Operation," is now available in both hardcover and Kindle e-book.

Copyright 1996-2024 Beville Operator Performance Specialists, Inc. All rights reserved. (937)434-1093. Beville@Beville.com