During a recent observation of a CCR console operator, he received a high temperature alarm on the outlet of a fin fan exchanger. Seeing that all fan motors were “on,” he suspected a broken belt and had the field investigate. His diagnosis was confirmed, a replacement was secured, the breaker was locked out, and a secondary mechanic installed the new belt. Total elapsed time from alarm actuation to the fan being back in service was approximately 25 minutes.
Almost more impressive than the speed with which this was done was the routine manner with which the crew handled it. It was not a rush-rush situation, but a trained group of personnel that knew how to do their job and did it in a methodical, but expedient manner. No reduction in unit rate was needed due to the short time without the fan. How would this have played out at your plant?Copyright © 2005 Beville Engineering, Inc. , All Rights Reserved
RELATED EXTERNAL MEDIA
|Consortium Reports New Findings on Alarm Rates||Automation World|
|How Many Alarms Can An Operator Handle||Chemical Processing|
|Impact of Alarm Rates and Interface Design on Operator Performance||Automation World|
|Operator Interfaces: Moving from Comfortable to Most Effective||Automation World|
|Operator Performance as a Function of Alarm Rate and Interface Design||Mesa.org|
The dates for this year's Fall meeting for the Center for Operator Performance will be announced soon. For more information, please contact Lisa Via. Guests are always welcome!
Our summer newsletter is now available. Click here!
Take our short survey on operator span of control. Click here (new window)
David Strobhar's book, "Human Factors in Process Plant Operation," is now available in both hardcover and Kindle e-book.
Copyright © 1996-2017 Beville Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved. (937)434-1093. Beville@Beville.com